Knowledge Question: To what
extent is scientific knowledge reliable?
Their presentation was brief
and used limited words which allowed them to have more explanations in their
speech. The real life situation chosen was the illuminati conspiracy in Atlanta.
During the snowstorms
in the USA, some people performed an experiment on the snow and found that if
you held a lighter to it, it did not melt and black soot marks appeared on the
snow. They then claimed that this was because there were chemicals and plastic
in the snow that were designed to control our minds. These theories were then
debunked by others, who explained that the melted water was being absorbed by
the sponge-like structure of the snow, as well as sublimation.
The area of knowledge that was
studied was natural science and they used reasoning and faith to explore their
knowledge issue. They concluded that these areas and ways of knowledge are
useful to determine the extent of the reliability of scientific knowledge. Something
special about this TOK presentation was that they explored 2 other real life
situations that are related to the knowledge issue that was brought up.
Floruen and Callum's presentation can be improved if it incorporated more TOK vocabulary and explored more areas of knowledge related to the real life situation. I believe the area of human science and language are possible Theory of Knowledge fields that could be incorporated for a more detailed presentation.
Floruen and Callum's presentation can be improved if it incorporated more TOK vocabulary and explored more areas of knowledge related to the real life situation. I believe the area of human science and language are possible Theory of Knowledge fields that could be incorporated for a more detailed presentation.
Strong analysis of this presentation. I agree with you.
ReplyDelete